The blog formerly known as   Fake Plastic Fish

June 12, 2012

Thoughts About Recycling Styrofoam After Japanese Dock Washes Up On Oregon Coast

You’ve probably already heard about the Japanese tsunami debris making its way across the ocean and the 66-foot long dock that washed ashore on the Oregon coast last week.  (According to NOAA, the debris is unlikely to be radioactive, by the way.)

The dock is a story in and of itself, but what made me realize it was also a story about plastic was the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department’s June 8 press release requesting bids for removal of the dock:

Salem, OR — The Oregon Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed options for removing the tsunami debris dock at Agate Beach. The department originally intended to pursue either of two options — demolition in place, or towing it off the beach to the nearby Port of Newport — but has since discovered the range of costs for these options overlaps. The reinforced concrete dock contains a large amount of styrofoam, making clean demolition a challenge and increasing the costs for that option.

Can you imagine the mess from demolition of that much Styrofoam? Lots of tiny pieces of polystyrene let loose into the environment. I can imagine it because, in fact, I see it at the Green Festival every year.

Is Eco-Struction Building Material Really Eco?

Eco-Struction is a company that designs and builds structures using Reclaimed Polystyrene ICF-Insulated Concrete Form Block. They show the product at the Green Festival every year.

You might think this is a great way to recycle Styrofoam, but check this out. Every single year, I can’t help noticing the bits of flaked off polystyrene foam on the floor surrounding the demo. And every year, I feel compelled to take pictures of it.

These plastic particles are getting into the environment even before construction is completed. I assume that the finished structure will be coated so that the foam will not continue to flake off. But what happens to all that polystyrene when the building reaches the end of its life? Nothing lasts forever. Not a house or a building or even a 66-foot dock.

A Problem With Recycling Plastic

I’ve discussed many of the drawbacks to plastic recycling on this blog and in my book. One thing to keep in mind is that plastic recycling is always downcycling. Plastic cannot be recycled an unlimited number of times because each time, the molecules lose strength. That same thing happens with a material like paper, but paper will finally biodegrade and return to the earth when it reaches the point where it can no longer be recycled. But those molecules of plastic will remain in the environment for a very long time, possibly releasing toxic chemicals and accumulating in the soil and water.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t recycle plastic or that we shouldn’t find uses for the plastic that’s already here.  But what I am saying is that the only real, sustainable solution to the plastic pollution problem is to stop creating so much of it in the first place.  And to really consider what’s going to happen to all those recycled styrofoam buildings or recycled bottle carpets and polar fleece (which also sheds miscroplastics into the environment) or recycled bag decking material.  Most of these things do not get further recycled and yet will linger on the planet for a very long time.

 

You might also enjoy...

ADVERTISEMENT

I only post ads for products I use myself. Your support helps to fund my plastic-free mission.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
marinacurtis17
8 years ago

great information

ptbranigan
10 years ago

Using these materials is not worth, not even an eco friendly ideas. It will only give is headache fixing even how matter we take control of it, and it also a waste that toxic to the environment.

Cheers
Peter of

ReedW
10 years ago

Leave the dock there, It will become a tourist attraction :) Maybe it could be used as an environmental teaching tool as well,

Bornagaingreen
10 years ago

My sister is an interior designer for the company which designs Target. She has started to feel guilt for being involved in tearing down perfectly fine structures, only to rebuild them with “green material” to make something a bit more trendy for the current time. Do you think some representatives of Ecostruction may feel the same way? You could interview/poke and prod them next year about their opinions on the matter.

InWomenWeTrust
10 years ago

What goes around comes around — the globe.

TrashZombie
10 years ago

When I do beach cleanups, I see lots of pieces of Styrofoam. Once it breaks down to the size of fish egg, it’s impossible to pick it up while animals in the ocean easily mistake it for food.
A research ship (Algalita & 5Gyres) has just departed from Japan and is heading Maui right now to research the Tsunami debris.
Please join my group for the online educational couse to read the reports from the voyage.
You can send the crew your comments and questions!
Check this event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/363422623715733/
or just email dance4oceans@gmail.com if you don’t do Facebook.
It’s FREE and fun to follow the research ship online.

Clare Thomas
10 years ago

Picked up over 900 pieces of styrofoam from one end of a beach once – all within a few square feet. Went back six months later and the same little area was covered in the stuff again.

Renee Delight-La Torre
10 years ago

Took a walk on the beach today (I live on the Northern Oregon Coast) Couldn’t help but notice a lot more styrofoam bits than I usually see. A lot more. I too, am concerned with what will wash up on our beaches. I not only regularly do beach clean up but I am reducing my own plastic use, inspired by My Plastic Free Life. Cleanup on the beach is as Beth mentioned in her book, trying to empty a bathtub with the water still running. Sigh.

AfricaInside
10 years ago

Thank you for your always thought provoking posts. I have been guilty of feeling green when I choose Trex decking instead of wood. But as you point out, that stuff lasts for a long time and can not be recycled again. That is new information to me so thanks.

Beth Terry
10 years ago
Reply to  AfricaInside

I actually contacted the Trex company to find out if the material could be recycled, and they said no. So it’s not just speculation. But if you have Trex decking, why not send them a letter and ask them to close the loop? :-)

TigerLee
10 years ago

It’s so bizarre that removing this is such an issue. Don’t we have the technology?? :) I propose a big crane lifts it out of the water, puts it on a truck and takes it somewhere where it can be used. Is that possible? Or an some big ship or something.

Beth Terry
10 years ago
Reply to  TigerLee

@TigerLee What truck would this fit on?

ShiploadofWilco
10 years ago
Reply to  Beth Terry

I see it shows the length but not the width. Maybe a semi? Too bad they do not say if it’s disintegrating or what sort of state it remains in. Could it be cleaned and reused somewhere else…maybe a lake or something? Or is it harmful and would mess up the water supply. Thanks for this post! I have been wondering when things would start washing ashore but missed this article in the Oregonian. :)

Beth Terry
10 years ago

@ShiploadofWilco @TigerLee The article says it’s “66-foot-long — 7 feet tall and 19 feet wide”. How big is a semi?

ShiploadofWilco
10 years ago

@Beth Terry @TigerLee i just looked it up: The DOT has established these vehicle limits: 8.5 feet (2.6m) wide, 13.5 feet (4.1m) in height, and 80,000 pounds (36,000 kg) gross weight. So I guess the truck would not be wide enough to handle it.

chicknlil
10 years ago

@Beth Terry @ShiploadofWilco @TigerLeeyou must me under 9 foot to be on the hwy. length varies from state to state, but they could always hire flaggers and an escort. you can use more than one trailer. they move pieces of wind turbines down the interstate and those things are huge!

CMEJAM
10 years ago

You are right chicknlil, there are transports built to deliver HUGE convections, cranes, 200ton bulldozers, fired heaters and large industrial pieces, however those items are generally not transported over-the-road for very long distances. They still require a rail or barge offload to avoid overhead obstructions.

CMEJAM
10 years ago
Reply to  TigerLee

@TigerLee
Part of the issue with this dock, also, is the fact that the microorganisms on it can wreak havoc on the native ecosystem. Dragging it around only loosens up these life forms. Its a double-whammy of a problem.

Alex Anglin-Shields
10 years ago

16000 people paid for this tragity with their lives….it will be cleaned up… we all need to look at what we are using in our lives… plastic is forever recycling is fake.

Barbie Wells-Joplin
10 years ago

right. the radioactive debris may not be here YET! If this doc made it’s way this far the radioactive stuff is not that many years behind it I’m sure. ugh…

Nancy Nathan Baldwin
10 years ago

Im scared what will wash up next. Were bound to get more. Whose footing the bill on this stuff? Us or them? I wonder…

Alexandru Miroiu
10 years ago

In my city all the buildings are being insulated, in a very unsustainable way, with blocks of styrofoam. You’ll be horrified to see how much of it is being let loose in the environment!

My Plastic-free Life
10 years ago

Yes, but not radioactive water. NOAA says that the debris that is floating across started its journey before the reactor melt down.

Barbie Wells-Joplin
10 years ago

If this dock from japan is showing up I’m assuming contaminated water is as well.

Ro Kumar
10 years ago

Yuck…thanks for sharing Beth